Case summary

Background (age, sex, occupation, baseline function)

  • 82-year-old man
  • Recently transferred to local care home following long hospital admission
  • Previously:
    • 20 years ago he suffered a lumber discectomy and decided to retire at 62 after a long career in business
    • In retirement, he lived alone in a remote location
  • Three children but none are local

History of presentation/reason for review

  • Medication review following admission to care home (change of care setting)

Current medical history and relevant co-morbidities

  • Admitted to hospital seven months ago following a fall at home
    • Fractured right neck of femur and repaired with dynamic hip screw
    • Confused post operatively which resolved but remained cognitively impaired
    • Concerns raised at time of admission, house noted to be in a mess, no food in house and general state of ill repair
    • Family do not live locally and had not seen him recently
    • Diagnosed with dementia and unable to return home due to combination of mobility and cognitive impairment
    • No welfare power of attorney and long wait in hospital for guardianship to support discharge
  • Little medical contact in year prior to admission
  • Suspected transient ischaemic attack (TIA) with transient speech upset - five years ago
  • Hypertension - five years ago
  • Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus diagnosed - five years ago
  • Bowel cancer leading to right hemicolectomy - 10 years ago
  • Lumbar discectomy L4/5 - 20 years ago
  • Hard of hearing

Current medication and drug allergies (include over the counter (OTC) preparation, traditional medicines and herbal remedies)

Allergies or adverse drug reactions: nil

Currently prescribed: 

  • Adcal-D3® 750mg/200IU caplets: two caplets twice a day
  • Amlodipine 10mg tablets: one tablet daily
  • Aspirin 75mg dispersible tablets: one tablet daily
  • Atorvastatin 80mg tablets: one tablet daily
  • Folic acid 5mg tablets: one tablet daily
  • Gabapentin 300mg capsules: three capsules three times a day
  • Gliclazide 80mg tablets: one tablet twice a day
  • Lisinopril 10mg tablets: one tablet daily
  • Lisinopril 20mg tablets: one tablet daily
  • Lorazepam 500micrograms tablets: one tablet at night
  • Omeprazole 20mg capsules: one capsule daily
  • Paracetamol 500mg tablets: two tablets four times a day
  • Sertraline 100mg tablets: one tablet daily

Over the counter medicines: nil

Lifestyle and current function

  • Clinical Frailty Score (Rockwood) 7 - severely frail - completely dependent for all personal care
  • Assistance of one needed to transfer. Stand aid hoist needed when tired
  • Assistance of one to mobilise with walking aid
  • Can communicate simple conversation. Often disorientated to place
  • Catheter (since hospital admission) and occasional faecal incontinence
  • Eats well but needs prompting and supervision

“What matters to me” (ideas, concerns and expectations of treatment)

  • Has enjoyed video conference contact with family who had not been in touch for a while
  • Lots of foreign travel over his life and enjoys talking about this
  • He is not keen to mobilise and prefers to be sedentary
  • Initially he did not leave his room and engage with others but slowly engaging more and appears to enjoy that
  • No current issues with pain

Observations, examinations and results 

Note: local laboratory reference ranges may vary

Bloods updated recently

  • Weight 54kg, Height 177cm, BMI 17kg/m2
  • BP 110/60 mmHg
  • Creatinine 82 micromol/L (60-120 micromol/L), calculated creatinine clearance 39 ml/min
  • HbA1c 38 mmol/mol (5.6%)

Most recent relevant consultations

  • None recently as he has been in hospital for seven months

7 steps: Person specific issues to address

1.  Aims: What matters to the individual about their condition(s)?

Review diagnoses and consider:

  • Therapeutic objectives of drug therapy
  • Management of existing health problems
  • Prevention of future health issues, including lifestyle advice 

Ask person to complete PROMs (Questions to answer before medicines review) before their review

Person specific issues to address

  • Support and encourage independence and interaction where possible 
  • Ensure symptoms are well controlled 

 

2.  Need: Identify essential drug therapy

Identify essential drugs (not to be stopped without specialist advice)

  • Drugs that have essential replacement functions (e.g. levothyroxine) 
  • Drugs to prevent rapid symptomatic decline (e.g. drugs for Parkinson’s disease, heart failure) 

Person specific issues to address

  • No drugs considered essential

 

3. Does the individual take unnecessary drug therapy?

Identify and review the continued need for drugs

  • what is medication for?
  • with temporary indications
  • with higher than usual maintenance doses
  • with limited benefit/evidence for use
  • with limited benefit in the person under review (see Drug efficacy & applicability (NNT) table)

Person specific issues to address

  • Gabapentin: indication not clear and may no longer be needed. Risk of sedation and confusion 
  • Lisinopril and amlodipine: tight blood pressure control, likely to be over treated. Target BP control should consider comorbidities and frailty using a person-centred approach
  • Gliclazide: tight HbA1c, therefore likely over treated 
  • Sertraline: unclear indication, may be possible to withdraw 
  • Atorvastatin: likely commenced after possible TIA several years ago, likely limited effect now 
  • Lorazepam: unclear indication, may be possible to withdraw
  • Folic acid: may no longer be needed 
  • Review indications for all medications in old notes/records 

 

4.  Effectiveness: Are therapeutic objectives being achieved?

Identify the need for adding/intensifying drug therapy to achieve therapeutic objectives

  • to achieve symptom control
  • to achieve biochemical/clinical targets
  • to prevent disease progression/exacerbation
  • is there a more appropriate medication to achieve goals?

Person specific issues to address

  • Recent hip fracture and no investigations recorded for osteoporosis. Consider if life expectancy sufficient for time to benefit from treatment. In this case may be too short. Note: if considering bisphosphonate treatment need to assess dental health 
  • Assess pain control. Is paracetamol still needed as regularly as four times a day?

 

5. Safety: Does the individual have or is at risk of ADR/ side effects? Does the patient know what to do if they’re ill?

Identify individual safety risks by checking for

Identify adverse drug effects by checking for

  • specific symptoms/laboratory markers (e.g. hypokalaemia)
  • cumulative adverse drug effects (see ADR table)
  • drugs used to treat side effects caused by other drugs

Medication Sick Day guidance

  • Ensure discussion and clear information on which medicines to withhold at times of dehydrating illness

Person specific issues to address

  • Risk of hypoglycaemia with tight blood glucose control 
  • Risk of falls and increased harm with tight blood pressure control 
  • Risk of sedation and increased confusion with gabapentin 
  • Risk of sedation and increased falls with lorazepam 
  • Medication Sick Day Guidance: ensure staff have clear information on medication to withhold (in this case lisinopril and gliclazide if continuing) 

 

6.  Sustainability: Is drug therapy cost-effective and environmentally sustainable?

Identify unnecessarily costly drug therapy by

  • considering more cost-effective alternatives, formulary choices, safety, convenience

Consider the environmental impact of

  • Inhaler use
  • Single use plastics
  • Medicines waste
    • over-ordering
    • disposal
  • Water pollution 

Person specific issues to address

  • All medicines are formulary choices 
  • Care home advised to dispose of medicines through community pharmacy and advised to only order what is needed

 

7.  Person-centredness: Is the person willing and able to take drug therapy as intended?

Does the person understand the outcomes of the review?

  • Consider Teach back

Ensure drug therapy changes are tailored to individual’s preferences. Consider

  • is the medication in a form they can take?
  • is the dosing schedule convenient?
  • what assistance is needed?
  • are they able to take medicines as intended?

Agree and communicate plan

  • discuss and agree with the individual/carer/welfare proxy therapeutic objectives and treatment priorities
  • include lifestyle and holistic management goals
  • inform relevant health and social care providers of changes in treatments across the transitions of care

Ask person to complete PROMs (Questions to answer after medicines review) after their review

Agreed plan

  • Stop lorazepam 
  • Stop Review HbA1c after three months 
  • Consider stopping atorvastatin due to limited life expectancy 
  • Reduce and stop lisinopril and amlodipine
  • Reduce gabapentin gradually and assess pain control 
  • Reduce and stop sertraline, if agreed
  • Change calcium/vitamin D supplement to a once daily preparation
  • Low BMI and history of acute on chronic poor nutrition. Encourage continued focus on nutrition in care home. Look for old weights in notes/records. Assess Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) score
  • Potential for improvement in physical and cognition with improved nutrition, encouragement to mobilise and interaction in care home activities. 
  • Discuss changes with appointed guardian

 

Key concepts in this case

  • Transfer to long-term care is an important change of care setting and is a trigger for medication review
  • Frail older adults frequently have a range of conditions with diagnosis often made when younger and fitter. Treatment targets are likely to change with time and caution is needed to prevent over treatment
  • Improvements in function can be made with non-drug interventions especially in adults who have become deconditioned due to illness or social isolation. Consider nutrition as a reversible cause of decline in function
  • Ensure all medications have a valid current indication
  • Sedatives should be avoided especially for long-term use
  • Reduced time in medication administration can free time for other activities for the individual and staff that may be more beneficial
  • Social health is important, and care plan should involve exploration of individual’s interests and enjoyments