Methodology used in the current guidance
As with previous versions, the literature had been reviewed to inform updates and changes. In addition, the polypharmacy group used the considered judgement process, the detail of which can be found in Methods for deriving evidence-based guidance, below. The table below summarises the relevance of the recommendations made and will support the sections that follow.
Considered judgement options
| Judgement | Recommendation | Wording for judgement |
|
Undesirable consequences clearly outweigh desirable consequences |
Strong recommendation against | Should |
|
Undesirable consequences probably outweigh desirable consequences |
Conditional recommendation against | Could |
|
Balance between desirable and undesirable consequences is closely balanced or uncertain |
Recommendation for research and possibly conditional recommendation for use restricted to trials | Consider |
|
Desirable consequences clearly outweigh undesirable consequences |
Strong recommendation for | Should |
|
Desirable consequences probably outweigh undesirable consequences |
Conditional recommendation for |
Could |
Please note that the above table may need to be scrolled horizontally or vertically in order to view all information, depending on your device.
Further evidence search information: