Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)

Background

This document provides a national clinical pathway for the diagnosis, assessment, management, and referral of Metabolic Dysfunction Associated Liver Disease (MASLD) and Met-ALD in Scotland. It outlines criteria for primary and secondary care, including fibrosis assessment, lifestyle advice, and the integration of liver screening and diagnostic tools. This pathway is intended for professional use; it is NOT for use by members of the public. It is not replacement for advice from your usual healthcare professional. 

MASLD and Met-ALD definitions:

  • MASLD is the updated term for Non-Alcohol Related Fatty Liver Disease, occurring mainly in overweight or obese individuals with metabolic dysfunction features;
  • Met-ALD applies to those exceeding recommended alcohol intake but below pure Alcohol-related Liver Disease thresholds.


Metabolic dysfunction criteria:

  • Impaired Glucose Tolerance* (IGT) or Type II DM
  • BP > 130/85 mmHg or antihypertensive therapy
  • Plasma triglycerides ≥ 1.70 mmol/L or lipid lowering therapy
  • HDL cholesterol ≤ 1.0 (male) or 1.3 mmol/L (female)


Diagnosis in primary care: MASLD diagnosis requires:

  • typical liver function test abnormalities (mildly elevated ALT/AST and often GGT),
  • negative non-invasive liver screens for other causes
  • alcohol consumption within ≤14 units/week;
    Met-ALD is diagnosed when alcohol intake is >14 but below sex-specific upper limits defining alcohol related liver disease (ArLD).

Liver screen and investigation: (see appendix 1) 
A standard liver screen should exclude

  • viral hepatitis
  • haemochromatosis
  • autoimmune liver disease

Ultrasound in primary care:

Only required if

  • elevated alkaline phosphatase or
  • high risk of cirrhosis (FIB-4 > 3.25)


Fibrosis assessment: 

The FIB-4 score is used to assess fibrosis risk, with thresholds adjusted for age;

  • scores below 1.3 (or 2.0 if ≥65 years) indicate low risk
  • elevated scores warrant further testing with ELF where available or referral for further fibrosis assessment
  • FIB-4 is not reliable under age 35.


Referral criteria: 

Referral to secondary care is recommended for

  • patients under 35
  • Age 35–65 with FIB-4 >1.3
  •  ≥65 with FIB-4 >2.0
  • Where ELF testing is available use to further risk stratify those <35 or with elevated FIB-4, referring if ≥9.8.


At all times consider co-morbidities and frailty when deciding to refer

  • Lifestyle advice: Emphasise sustainable long-term changes including
  • 10% body weight loss to resolve steatosis and improve fibrosis
  • calorie deficit guidance
  • alcohol reduction or abstinence especially with elevated fibrosis risk
  • encouragement of regular exercise per WHO guidelines
  • referral to weight loss programs where available

Screening for and management of cardiovascular risk :
Cardiovascular disease is the primary cause of death amongst patients with MASLD/Met-ALD.

 
Secondary care assessment process: 

Includes nurse-led evaluation of

  • BMI
  • medical and alcohol history
  • medication review
  • completion of liver screen (if not completed in Primary care)
  • diabetes screening
  • updated labs
  • Fibroscan to guide diagnosis and management

Secondary care management:

 Uses liver stiffness measurement (LSM) to stratify risk; This is most commonly via Fibroscan but other methods are available (see Appendix 2)

Fibroscan

  • LSM <10 kPa allows discharge
  • 10–15 kPa suggests monitoring and lifestyle intervention, or drug therapy as it becomes available
  • LSM >15 kPa indicates probable cirrhosis requiring specialist follow-up, with considerations for portal hypertension and surveillance.  Consider pharmacological treatments as these become available.

Primary care pathway

Please click on the below image to view the pathway

 

Notes

†Liver screen abnormalities compatible with MASLD:

  • Raised IgA - raised in MASLD/MET-ALD/ArLD
  • Mildly elevated ferritin, with normal fasting transferrin saturation (check HFE if both elevated)
  • Low titre anti-nuclear/anti-smooth muscle antibodies (ANA/SMA) - if IgG is normal then less likely to be of significance.

Weekly alcohol intake and fatty liver;

  • ≤14U - MASLD Metabolic dysfunction, Associated Steatotic Liver Disease
  • 14<>50/35 male/female Met-ALD - MASLD with moderately elevated alcohol intake
  • > 50/35 U/week male/female - ArLD Alcohol Related Liver Disease

Secondary care pathway

Click on the image to view the pathway

Notes

† Liver nurse MASLD assessment

  • Update weight and BMI
  • Confirm drug and alcohol history
  • Assess performance status, comorbidities and activity levels
  • Ensure complete negative liver screen
  • Repeat LFTs, FBC and recalculate FIB-4
  • Perform Fibroscan
  • Disease education
  • Tailored lifestyle education

‡ Repeat Fibroscan interval

  • 2 years if LSM > 10kPa
  • 3 years if under 35 years of age and LSM<10kPa

Appendix

Appendix 1.

Suggested Liver Screen

  • Repeat LFTs
    • Requires FBC for FIB-4 calculation
    • Include AST to calculate FIB-4 if not part of routine LFTs
    • GGT if ALP elevated and not part of routine LFTs
      If GGT not included in standard LFTs then check if ALP raised (if GGT normal consider bone causes)
  • Blood Borne Virus Screen:
    • Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg), Hepatitis C antibody (Anti-HCV).
    • If from a high prevalence country or relevant risk factors, also offer HIV testing.
  • Ferritin/Transferrin Saturation
  • Liver Autoantibodies and Anti-Nuclear Antibody (ANA)
  • Immunoglobulins– electrophoresis not required, request immunoglobulins without electrophoresis where this option is available.

NotesFerritin/Transferrin saturation


Ferritin is often mildly elevated in MASLD/MetALD, as well as other liver conditions causing hepatic inflammation and causes systemic inflammation.

Transferrin saturation is a better screening test for haemochromatosis, however may be falsely elevated if non-fasting samples are obtained.

CfsD Genetic Haemochromatosis guidelines recommend considering HFE gene testing for haemochromatosis when:

Tsat >45% and serum ferritin >300ng/mL in males and post-menopausal females

Tsat >40% and serum ferritin >200ng/mL in pre-menopausal females


Liver autoantibodies


Autoimmune liver disease is associated with a variety of antibodies, including antinuclear antibody (ANA) as well as more liver specific autoantibodies such as anti-mitochondrial (AMA), anti-smooth muscle (SMA), anti-liver-kidney-microsomal (LKM) and anti-liver cytosol antibodies.

Low titre antibodies are relatively common in MASLD. Normal levels of immunoglobulins can help to judge the likelihood of significance and should be tested if positive antibodies are encountered and not already performed.

Appendix 2

Shearwave elastography

Shearwave elastography, incorportated into some ultrasound machines, is another means of non- invasive assessment of fibrosis.

Cut offs are different from those used for Fibroscan, and vary between manufacturers.

Examples of thresholds used are below. Please use local guidance for correct cut-offs:

NHS Western Isles (primary care referral)

Interpretation of liver stiffness results (2D SWE)
Liver stiffness value Recommendation
≤5 kPa High probability of being normal
5-9 kPa In the absence of other clinical signs, rules out cACLD. If there are known clinical signs, may need further investigation
9-13 kPa Suggestive of cACLD
>13 kPa Rules in cACLD
> 17 kPa Suggestive of CSPH

Definitions: cACLD = compensated Advanced Chronic Liver Disease, CSPH = Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension

Note: these cut off levels are established for viral hepatitis and NAFLD. They are less well defined for other forms of chronic liver disease but act as a pragmatic guide (e.g., Wilsons Autoimmune Hepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis)

NHS Lothian (secondary care referral)

Stage Fibrosis stage Speed (m/s) Elasticity (kPa)
F0-F1 Non-significant <1,54 <7.1
≥ F2 Significant 1,54 - 1,78 7.1 - 9.5
≥F3 Advanced 1,78 - 1,87 9.5 - 10.5
F4 Cirrhosis > 1,87 >10.5

References

References
1. Rinella ME, Lazarus JV, Ratziu V, Francque SM, Sanyal AJ, Kanwal F, et al. A multisociety Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature. J Hepatol. 2023 Dec;79(6):1542–56.


2. The Scottish Health Survey 2022 – volume 1: main report. [cited 2024 Apr 4]; Available from: https://www.gov.scot/publications/scottish-health-survey-2022-volume-1-main-report/


3. Roskilly A, Hicks A, Taylor EJ, Jones R, Parker R, Rowe IA. Fibrosis progression rate in a systematic review of placebo-treated nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Liver Int. 2021 May;41(5):982–95.


4. Macpherson I. Ultrasound findings amongst patients enrolled in NHS Tayside iLFTs pilot. Personal communication. 2024 May 30;


5. McPherson S, Hardy T, Dufour J-F, Petta S, Romero-Gomez M, Allison M, et al. Age as a Confounding Factor for the Accurate Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Advanced NAFLD Fibrosis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 May;112(5):740–51.


6. Anstee QM, Berentzen TL, Nitze LM, Jara M, Jensen AB, Kjær MS, et al. Prognostic utility of Fibrosis-4 Index for risk of subsequent liver and cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality in individuals with obesity and/or type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal cohort study. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Jan;36:100780.


7. Shang Y, Akbari C, Dodd M, Zhang X, Wang T, Jemielita T, et al. Association between longitudinal biomarkers and major adverse liver outcomes in patients with non-cirrhotic metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. Hepatology. 2024 Aug 7;10.1097/HEP.0000000000001045.


8. Hagström H, Talbäck M, Andreasson A, Walldius G, Hammar N. Repeated FIB-4 measurements can help identify individuals at risk of severe liver disease. J Hepatol. 2020 Nov;73(5):1023–9.


9. Kjaergaard M, Lindvig KP, Thorhauge KH, Andersen P, Hansen JK, Kastrup N, et al. Using the ELF test, FIB-4 and NAFLD fibrosis score to screen the population for liver disease. J Hepatol. 2023 Aug;79(2):277–86.


10. Pearson M, Nobes J, Macpherson I, Gold L, Miller M, Dow E, et al. Enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) score predicts hepatic decompensation and mortality. JHEP Rep. 2024 Jun 1;6(6):101062.


11. Mottin CC, Moretto M, Padoin AV, Swarowsky AM, Toneto MG, Glock L, et al. The role of ultrasound in the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis in morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg. 2004 May;14(5):635–7.


12. Saadeh S, Younossi ZM, Remer EM, Gramlich T, Ong JP, Hurley M, et al. The utility of radiological imaging in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2002 Sep;123(3):745–50.


13. Cacciottolo TM, Kumar A, Godfrey EM, Davies SE, Allison M. Spleen Size Does Not Correlate With Histological Stage of Liver Disease in People With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Feb;21(2):535-537.e1.


14. Vilar-Gomez E, Martinez-Perez Y, Calzadilla-Bertot L, Torres-Gonzalez A, Gra-Oramas B, Gonzalez-Fabian L, et al. Weight Loss Through Lifestyle Modification Significantly Reduces Features of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Gastroenterology. 2015 Aug;149(2):367-78.e5; quiz e14-5.


15. Linde JA, Jeffery RW, French SA, Pronk NP, Boyle RG. Self-weighing in weight gain prevention and weight loss trials. Ann Behav Med. 2005 Dec;30(3):210–6.


16. VanWormer JJ, Linde JA, Harnack LJ, Stovitz SD, Jeffery RW. Self-weighing frequency is associated with weight gain prevention over 2 years among working adults. Int J Behav Med. 2012 Sep;19(3):351–8.


17. Tate DF, Lutes LD, Bryant M, Truesdale KP, Hatley KE, Griffiths Z, et al. Efficacy of a Commercial Weight Management Program Compared With a Do-It-Yourself Approach: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2226561.


18. Marti-Aguado D, Calleja JL, Vilar-Gomez E, Iruzubieta P, Rodríguez-Duque JC, Del Barrio M, et al. Low-to-moderate alcohol consumption is associated with increased fibrosis in individuals with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. J Hepatol [Internet]. 2024 Jul 4; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2024.06.036


19. de Franchis R, Bosch J, Garcia-Tsao G, Reiberger T, Ripoll C, Baveno VII Faculty. Baveno VII - Renewing consensus in portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2022 Apr;76(4):959–74.


20. Shearer JE, Jones R, Parker R, Ferguson J, Rowe IA. The natural history of advanced chronic liver disease defined by transient elastography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol [Internet]. 2022 Mar 22 [cited 2022 Mar 30];0(0). Available from: https://www.cghjournal.org/article/S1542-3565(22)00290-7/pdf


21. Mózes FE, Lee JA, Vali Y, Alzoubi O, Staufer K, Trauner M, et al. Performance of non-invasive tests and histology for the prediction of clinical outcomes in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: an individual participant data meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Aug;8(8):704–13.


22. Gawrieh S, Vilar-Gomez E, Wilson LA, Pike F, Kleiner DE, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, et al. Increases and decreases in liver stiffness measurement are independently associated with the risk of liver-related events in NAFLD. J Hepatol [Internet]. 2024 May 16; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2024.05.008

Download pathway document

Click the image to view the pathway document: